| |
Unsolved
Problems in Lunar Science
It is clear from the foregoing
discussion that although a framework for the formation of the
Moon, consistent with the available astronomical, physical,
chemical, geological and chronological data has been
developed, much remains to be understood about its origin and
early evolution. It is desirable to identify problems with the
current models and gaps in our understanding, so that goals
for future missions to the Moon can be defined. Such an
exercise cannot be exhaustive and, at the same time, would be
subjective. Bearing these limitations, we enumerate some
interesting points here. The giant impact hypothesis, though
able to explain most of the observations, appears to be ad
hoc. It also considers only two bodies in isolation, a large
impactor and the earth, whereas some debris from previous
collisions on the earth and several moonlets may be already
existing
at the time of the
terminal giant impact. Their role in the formation of the Moon
remains to be ascertained. There are also questions related to
the magma ocean. The extent of magma ocean is not known,
although there are indications that less than half of the Moon
was involved. The question whether the Moon has a core or not,
and its size and composition, has been extensively debated,
but there are no seismological observations which can provide
a direct and conclusive answer.
The formation of the Moon’s
core is also related to the size of the magma ocean. The
extremely high concentration of incompatible elements (KREEP,
U, Th, etc.) in the Procellarum–Imbrium–Frigoris regions on
the
near-side of the Moon and their relatively low concentrations
in the SPAR on the far side (Figures 1 and 2) have a bearing
on the extent and the homogeneity of the magma ocean, chemical
inhomogeneities of the crust and chemical processes
responsible for formation of the large
differentiated regions. Opinions are widely divided on the LHB
episode. Does it really represent a peak in lunar cratering
history or is it simply the tailing of the frequency of
accretionary impacts? Studies of large basins on Mercury, Mars
and asteroids have raised the question of this peak in
cratering frequency: whether it was solar system-wide,
confined to the inner planets or only to the Moon24? The LHB
was caused by planetesimals moving in heliocentric orbits or
by moonlets in geocentric orbits. The composition of
impactors25 would be useful in understanding the earth’s
accretionary history and the nature of the source material as
well. Period and mechanism of the formation of some large mare
basins, e.g. South Pole Aitken basin, is not understood. It
requires about a 1000-km impactor with low relative velocity
to form this basin. It was probably formed about 4.2 Ga and
may still have some surviving original impact melt material. A
sample return mission to SPAR should be informative. The lunar
cataclysm has catastrophic consequences for living organisms
on the earth. The fossil records and biogenic isotopes found
in terrestrial rocks show that life may have existed on the
earth as early as 3.8 Ga and water as early as 4.2 Ga, well
within the time span covered by large impacts on the
earth–Moon system. While large impacts occurred on the Moon
(4.2–3.8 Ga), how could life evolve or survive on the earth,
which should have been subjected to at least ten times more
impacts, so energetic that the oceans and environment on the
earth would be sterilized? Since the time bracket of LHB is
based on only a few breccias, the cataclysmic era is not well
constrained. It is important to define the cut-off time of
large impacts on the Moon as well as on the earth from the
point of view
of the biological
evolution. For this reason, samples of the far side of the
Moon are very crucial. Some of the problems stated above can
be resolved by long cores (several km) from selected sites on
the Moon. Long cores through the bedrock can provide
information about stratigraphic relations, composition of the
lunar interior and heat flow (which depends on the radioactive
content). A soil core going to the bedrock can provide insight
into the nature of the solar activity (solar wind, heavy
nuclei, solar energetic particles), way back in time when the
lunar crust had just formed. Their flux and isotopic
composition may be related to the nuclear reactions in the
sun. The 2-m long Apollo 15 core represented roughly 1 Ga of
records and therefore extending it to 4.5 Ga may not be
difficult. However, taking long cores through soil or bedrock
may pose challenging technical problems. It is, therefore,
necessary to explore scientific programmes that are realizable
and inexpensive. Recent studies have raised questions
regarding the various hypotheses related to early lunar
chemical processes. For example, the thickness of individual
flows within a basin is not well determined. Volcanism on the
far side of the Moon and its chronology still remain to be
quantified. It is believed that filling of mare basins was a
prolonged process which took several hundred million years.
The onset and termination of lava-filling should be precisely
determined. We ought to know where the youngest and oldest
basalts on the moon are exposed and what are their absolute
age, composition and stratigraphy. An important objective,
therefore, could be to get a timestratigraphic sequence from
the regolith as well as from mare basalts. The mineralogical
stratigraphy of lunar mare basalts and crust is crucial for
understanding the evolution of the Moon. The best current
imagery suitable for crater counts is that of Lunar Orbiter
and Apollo missions, but is not available for the entire Moon.
The data are particularly lacking for the far side.
Stratigraphic investigations require high-resolution imaging
under relatively low sun angle, so that crater rims and flow
fronts can be clearly identified. On the other hand,
mineralogical studies need high sun angle so that shadows can
be avoided. Clementine and Lunar Prospector have provided
global mineralogical and chemical data27,28, but superior data
with high spatial resolution can be obtained with new sensors
with high spectral resolution available now.
Information Courtesy:
PRL, India
|
|